Contact Us

Richard A. Jenson
President
Jenson Research & Communications
Twelve Four Hundred HWY 71 West
Suite 350 PMB 191
Austin, Texas 78738
512-264-3826 Office 512-656-7934 Cell
MEMBER AMERICAN SOCIETY OF TRIAL CONSULTANTS

rajenson@aol.com

Oil Field/Refinery Safety Advertising

Caballero v. Esenjay Petroleum Corporation

Case Summary: An oil field worker was severely injured when a pressure-control device failed. He suffered brain damage, vision and hearing loss, broken vertebrae, a crushed foot and ankle, and a dislocated hip. The injured worker, along with his attorneys, traded a multi-million dollar punitive damage award for a promise by the oil company to implement greater safety controls to protect all workers at the company.

Communications Strategy

The client, who was willing to tell his story, was utilized to help get the message out to the public. He participated in variety of media interviews including the "Today" show. During the time of the interviews, we aired television and radio commercials and scheduled newspaper ads to run locally and nationally. The Wall Street Journal, the Houston Chronicle and the Corpus Christi Examiner(?) published articles about the case.

Campaign Elements

"Hardhat" 30-second Television Commercial National TV
Media Coverage Local, Regional and National Newspaper Press Coverage
"Hardhat" Consumer Newspaper Ad

 

Wright v. Citgo

Case Summary Lonnie Wright, a 53 year-old refinery worker, was killed in an explosion while assisting to light a boiler that did not meet safety codes. During investigations, it was discovered that management had known for years about safety hazards. As a condition of the settlement, a contract was obtained that forced the refinery to meet national safety codes.

Campaign Elements

"Wright Donation " :30 Television Commercial
Radio Commercial
Newspaper Advertisement
Press


Click image to enlarge
Click image to enlarge
Click image to enlarge
Click to see this commerical
Click to see this commerical

More Jenson & Associates Advertising Capabilities:

Automobile Safety‹ Durrill vs. Ford Motor Company, Harper vs. General Motors
Caballero vs. Esenjay Petroleum Corporation‹Upped safety standards to protect workers
Wright vs. Citgo‹Uncovered safety hazards management repeatedly ignored
Flinn vs. Eckerd Drugs‹Zero-tolerance policy on medication errors adopted by pharmacy
Bliskey vs. Berry Properties‹Locally tried, nationally recognized
Public Service Announcements‹Environmental Defense Fund, C.R.A.S.H., Seasonally-Driven Safety Organizations
Attorney-to-Attorney Advertising

   
   

For more information, or to contact us:
© 2000-2004, Jenson Research & Communications