|
Contact
Us
Richard A. Jenson
President
Jenson Research & Communications
Twelve Four Hundred HWY 71 West
Suite 350 PMB 191
Austin, Texas 78738
512-264-3826 Office 512-656-7934 Cell
MEMBER AMERICAN SOCIETY OF TRIAL CONSULTANTS
rajenson@aol.com
|
Oil
Field/Refinery Safety Advertising
Caballero
v. Esenjay Petroleum Corporation
Case
Summary: An oil field worker was severely injured when a pressure-control
device failed. He suffered brain damage, vision and hearing loss,
broken vertebrae, a crushed foot and ankle, and a dislocated hip.
The injured worker, along with his attorneys, traded a multi-million
dollar punitive damage award for a promise by the oil company to
implement greater safety controls to protect all workers at the
company.
Communications
Strategy
The
client, who was willing to tell his story, was utilized to help
get the message out to the public. He participated in variety of
media interviews including the "Today" show. During the time of
the interviews, we aired television and radio commercials and scheduled
newspaper ads to run locally and nationally. The Wall Street Journal,
the Houston Chronicle and the Corpus Christi Examiner(?) published
articles about the case.
Campaign
Elements
"Hardhat" 30-second Television Commercial National TV
Media Coverage Local, Regional and National Newspaper Press Coverage
"Hardhat" Consumer Newspaper Ad
Wright
v. Citgo
Case
Summary Lonnie Wright, a 53 year-old refinery worker, was killed
in an explosion while assisting to light a boiler that did not meet
safety codes. During investigations, it was discovered that management
had known for years about safety hazards. As a condition of the
settlement, a contract was obtained that forced the refinery to
meet national safety codes.
Campaign
Elements
"Wright
Donation " :30 Television Commercial
Radio Commercial
Newspaper Advertisement
Press
 |
 |

|
|
Click
image to enlarge
|
Click
image to enlarge
|
|
 |
|
|
Click
to see this commerical
|
Click
to see this commerical |
More
Jenson & Associates Advertising Capabilities:
Automobile
Safety‹ Durrill vs. Ford Motor Company, Harper vs. General Motors
Caballero vs. Esenjay Petroleum
Corporation‹Upped safety standards to protect workers
Wright vs. Citgo‹Uncovered
safety hazards management repeatedly ignored
Flinn vs. Eckerd Drugs‹Zero-tolerance
policy on medication errors adopted by pharmacy
Bliskey vs. Berry Properties‹Locally
tried, nationally recognized
Public Service Announcements‹Environmental
Defense Fund, C.R.A.S.H., Seasonally-Driven Safety Organizations
Attorney-to-Attorney Advertising
|